House Effects
Sunday, November 1, 20262 days until Election Day, November 3, 2026

The 2026 midterms, as the polls model them

Weighted averages of 3,194 polls, corrected for each pollster's measured lean, blended with partisanship, incumbency, and fundraising, and given the uncertainty that 2,313 past races say they deserve. How it works.

72% Democrats win control
Democrats 72%, Republicans 28%. The party with more seats runs the Senate, so 50 Democrats beat 49 Republicans if an unaligned independent holds the last seat (4% of simulations); a tie goes to Republicans through the vice president. Democrats average 51.5 seats (47 now); nine in ten simulations land between 47 and 55.

If the polls overstate Democrats the way they did in 2016–24 (about 1.8 points here): Democrats 48%, Republicans 52%. If they miss the other way by as much: Democrats 88%, Republicans 12%.

4448515651: outright majority →
Democrats control Republicans controlDemocratic seats after the election, 40,000 simulations
91% Democrats win control
Democrats average 232.7 seats (215 now); nine in ten simulations land between 214 and 254.

If the polls overstate Democrats the way they did in 2016–24 (about 1.6 points here): Democrats 77%, Republicans 23%. If they miss the other way by as much: Democrats 97%, Republicans 3%.

201216231261218 for Democratic control →
Democrats control Republicans controlDemocratic seats after the election, 40,000 simulations

Governors

All races →
26.9 of 50 governorships
Democratic governors expected after the election, against 24 now. Nine in ten simulations land between 22 and 33.

If the polls overstate Democrats the way they did in 2016–24 (about 4.2 points here): 23.0 Democratic governors. If they miss the other way by as much: 31.1 Democratic governors.

1624263624 now
share of simulationsDemocratic governors after the election, 40,000 simulations
Where things stand
Written from the model's output as of Sep 17
The numbers above are from Nov 1; the note is rewritten by hand and may lag them.

Democrats are favored to take the House and are slight favorites in a Senate fight that is close to a coin flip. The model gives them an 80% chance of a House majority against 20% for Republicans, with the simulations averaging 227 seats, 218 needed, and a 90% range of 209 to 247 that still contains defeat. The Senate is close to a toss-up: 54% Democratic control, 46% Republican, with the simulations averaging 50.2 seats from 47 now and a 90% range of 46 to 54. The party with more seats organizes the chamber, and the vice president only breaks ties, so Democrats need 51 seats, or 50 if an unaligned independent holds a seat Republicans would otherwise have. In 8% of simulations Democrats get control that way, most often through Dan Osborn in Nebraska; in 9% Republicans keep it only on the vice president's tie-breaking vote. Democratic governorships average 26.3, up from 24, in a range of 21 to 32.

Six or seven races decide the Senate. North Carolina (Roy Cooper at 90%) and Maine (Troy Jackson at 71%) are the likelier Democratic pickups, and Michigan (Abdul El-Sayed at 69%) is the least secure seat Democrats already hold. The fight sits in Texas, where James Talarico projects at D+1.1 and 58%, and Ohio's special, where Sherrod Brown projects at D+1.0 and 57%. In both, polls are better for Democrats than fundamentals: Texas polls average D+2.6 against fundamentals of R+3.7, Ohio D+2.9 against R+3.2. The model weights polls at 76% and 68% there, so the projection lands closer to the polls without fully believing them. Alaska (Mary Peltola, 42%) and Iowa (39%) lean the other way. Nebraska's non-Republican is independent Dan Osborn, at 44% on six polls.

The scenarios matter more than the headline. If polls overstate Democrats as they did on average from 2016 through 2024, Senate control odds fall to 27% and House odds to 59%. A miss of the same size in the other direction, as in the 2025 governor's races, puts them at 80% and 92%. The headline numbers assume no direction to the error. That assumption is doing most of the work.

National environment

The generic ballot

Asked which party they want in Congress, voters favor Democrats by 8.1 points in our average of 495 polls. Since 1998 that question has overstated Democrats by about 1.7 points at this stage, so the model reads the national environment as D+6.3, give or take 2.6.

R+10R+5EvenD+5D+10D+15D+20Jun ’25SepDecMar ’26JunSepD+8.1Election Day
adjusted weighted average shading: which side the average favors each poll, as published party-aligned pollster or sponsor
Generic ballot average
D+8.1
Latest poll ended Oct 30
Environment the model uses
D+6.3
After the historical 1.7-point correction; ±2.6 typical miss
Trump net approval
−22.9
37% approve, 60% disapprove. Shown for context; the model does not use it. 626 polls; latest ended Oct 27.
Senate

12 Senate races in play

Each row is one race: the dot is the projected margin, the bar holds half of simulated outcomes, and the line holds nine in ten. The hollow diamond is where the polls alone sit, and the heavy rule is the line for control: Democrats need every race above it. Shown: races where each party has at least a 1-in-20 chance; the rest are on the full Senate page.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
Governors

19 governor's races in play

Governor's races lean far less on partisanship than Senate races do, so the fundamentals get little weight here and unpolled races carry wide intervals. All 36 races.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
House

The 46 closest districts

Most districts have no public polls, so House projections lean on district partisanship, incumbency, fundraising, and the national environment, with district polls blended in where they exist. All 435 districts.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
Fresh data

Latest polls

The newest race polls in the database. See all of them, including the generic ballot.

DatesRacePollsterSampleDem.Rep.As publishedAdjustedShare of average
Oct 20–31Florida Governor
David Jolly v. Byron Donalds
ActiVote400 LV4852R+4R+3.9
moved 0.1 toward D
8.3%
source
Oct 23–31Illinois Governor
JB Pritzker v. Darren Bailey
ActiVote400 LV5941D+18D+18.1
moved 0.1 toward D
61%
source
Oct 17–31California Governor
Xavier Becerra v. Steve Hilton
ActiVote400 LV6337D+26D+26.1
moved 0.1 toward D
15%
source
Oct 27–30Texas Governor
Gina Hinojosa v. Greg Abbott
Kreate StrategiesREP.-ALIGNED900 LV4749R+2D+1.4
moved 3.4 toward D
6.3%
source
Oct 27–30Texas Senate
James Talarico v. Ken Paxton
Kreate StrategiesREP.-ALIGNED900 LV4845D+3D+6.4
moved 3.4 toward D
5.4%
source
Oct 26–30Florida Senate (special)
Angie Nixon v. Ashley Moody
Stetson University Center for Public Opinion Research852 RV4549R+4R+3.9
moved 0.1 toward D
4.7%
source
Oct 26–30Florida Governor
David Jolly v. Byron Donalds
Big Data Poll1,067 LV42.545.5R+3R+3.0
7.6%
source
Oct 26–30Florida Senate (special)
Angie Nixon v. Ashley Moody
Big Data Poll
for 1776 Law Center and Public Polling Project
1,067 LV43.550R+7R+6.5
7.8%
source
Oct 26–30Florida Governor
David Jolly v. Byron Donalds
Stetson University Center for Public Opinion Research852 RV4551R+6R+5.9
moved 0.1 toward D
4.6%
source
Oct 21–30Illinois Senate
Juliana Stratton v. Don Tracy
ActiVote400 LV5644D+12D+12.1
moved 0.1 toward D
61%
source
Oct 28–29Florida Governor
David Jolly v. Byron Donalds
InsiderAdvantage1,200 LV4549R+4R+3.5
moved 0.5 toward D
7.8%
source
Oct 23–29Texas Governor
Gina Hinojosa v. Greg Abbott
ActiVote400 LV47.952.1R+4R+4.1
moved 0.1 toward D
6.4%
source

LV: likely voters. RV: registered voters. A: all adults. “Adjusted” is the published margin after removing the sponsor shift and the pollster’s measured house effect; the small print says how far that moved the poll. Dem.-aligned and Rep.-aligned mark polls paid for by a party, a campaign, or an allied group, or taken by a firm whose published work is mostly for one side. They are shifted by the average lean of such polls, then counted at full weight.