House Effects
Wednesday, October 7, 202627 days until Election Day, November 3, 2026
2026 projections

The House

All 435 seats, on the lines in force this November, including the 9 states that redrew their maps since 2024. Only 94 districts have any public polling, so each projection starts from the district's 2024 presidential vote, the national environment, incumbency, the incumbent's last over- or under-performance, and the fundraising gap, then blends in district polls where they exist.

Democrats win control
81%
Democrats 81%, Republicans 19%; 218 seats make a majority.
Democratic seats, expected
228.3
An average over simulations, not a single forecast. 215 now; nine in ten simulations: 210 to 250.
195210216225240255218 for Democratic control →10%
Democrats control Republicans controlDemocratic seats after the election, 40,000 simulations
Safe D 198Likely D 9Lean D 11Toss-up 13Lean R 18Likely R 23Safe R 163
The assumption that matters most: which way the polls miss
If…Democrats win controlRepublicans win controlDemocratic seats
No direction assumed (still carries the usual uncertainty)81%19%228.3
Polls overstate Democrats as they did, on average, in 2016–24 (1.6 points)63%37%221.8
Polls understate Democrats by the same amount (1.6 points)92%8%235.4

“No direction assumed” does not mean the polls are assumed to be exactly right: every row above, including that one, already carries the historical size of past misses as uncertainty (see Uncertainty) — the win probabilities and seat ranges everywhere on this page are built from that spread. It means only that the model does not bet on which direction the next miss runs, unlike the two rows below it. From 2016 through 2024 the projections this method would have made ran too Democratic on average; before that they ran about even, and in the 2025 governor's races the polls missed the other way. These rows show what a repeat of that pattern, or its mirror image, would mean on top of the uncertainty already built in.

Race by race

61 districts where either side has at least a 1-in-10 chance

The heavy rule is the majority line: the district just above it is the 218th most Democratic seat in the country. Far more Republican-held seats than Democratic ones sit near that line, which is why Democrats are favored overall even though the 218th seat itself is close to even. District polls are scarce and often sponsored; they get about half the weight in a polled district. How polls and fundamentals are blended.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
FL-14
Castor v. Beltran
D+6.9
87% D
OH-1
Landsman v. Conroy
D+6.7
86% D
NE-2
Powell v. Harding
D+6.2
84% D
NM-2
Vasquez v. Cunningham
D+5.7
83% D
NH-1
Shaheen v. DiLorenzo
D+5.4
81% D
OH-7
Poindexter v. Miller
D+5.2
84% D
FL-25
Moskowitz v. Singer
D+4.2
76% D
AZ-1
Shah v. Feely
D+4.0
77% D
CA-48
Wilpert v. Desmond
D+3.3
72% D
NJ-7
Bennett v. Kean
D+3.2
71% D
NC-1
Davis v. Buckhout
D+3.1
71% D
TX-34
Gonzalez v. Flores
D+2.4
68% D
PA-7
Brooks v. Mackenzie
D+2.4
67% D
CO-8
Rutinel v. Evans
D+1.8
63% D
PA-10
Stelson v. Perry
D+1.6
61% D
TX-15
Pulido v. Cruz
D+1.6
62% D
WA-3
Perez v. Braun
D+1.5
61% D
▲ House majority: Democrats need every race above this line
IA-1
Bohannan v. Miller-Meeks
D+1.3
59% D
OH-9
Kaptur v. Merrin
D+1.3
59% D
NC-11
Ager v. Balkcom
D+1.1
57% D
NY-17
Conley v. Lawler
D+1.1
58% D
AZ-6
Mendoza v. Ciscomani
D+0.7
55% D
CA-22
Villegas v. Valadao
R+0.1
51% R
FL-7
Dalton v. Elijah
R+0.1
51% R
WI-3
Cooke v. Orden
R+0.3
52% R
FL-22
Dandiya v. Askar
R+0.3
53% R
VA-1
Taylor v. Wittman
R+0.6
54% R
VA-2
Luria v. Kiggans
R+1.1
57% R
MI-7
Lawrence v. Barrett
R+1.2
59% R
IA-3
Garriott v. Nunn
R+1.2
58% R
ME-2
Dunlap v. LePage
R+1.5
62% R
MT-1
Forstag v. Flint
R+1.6
62% R
AR-2
Jones v. Hill
R+2.3
66% R
MI-4
McCann v. Huizenga
R+2.4
66% R
PA-8
Cognetti v. Bresnahan
R+2.4
67% R
MI-10
Hines v. Bouchard
R+2.5
66% R
WI-1
Berman v. Steil
R+2.5
67% R
IA-2
James v. Mitchell
R+2.5
67% R
KY-6
Dembo v. Alvarado
R+2.9
71% R
FL-9
Soto v. Green
R+2.9
68% R
SC-1
Lacore v. Honeycutt
R+3.1
72% R
MO-2
Wellman v. Wagner
R+3.3
72% R
TX-35
Garcia v. Cruz
R+4.1
75% R
NV-2
Benitez-Thompson v. Flippo
R+4.4
80% R
CO-5
Killin v. Crank
R+4.5
77% R
PA-1
Harvie v. Fitzpatrick
R+4.5
81% R
FL-16
Kirschner v. Gruters
R+4.6
80% R
AL-2
Figures v. Marques
R+4.8
81% R
NY-1
Gallant v. LaLota
R+4.8
78% R
MN-1
Johnson v. Finstad
R+4.8
79% R
FL-11
Pericola v. Strada
R+4.9
79% R
FL-13
Gray v. Luna
R+5.0
83% R
TX-23
Stout v. Herrera
R+5.4
81% R
NE-1
Backemeyer v. Flood
R+5.4
83% R
OH-15
Leonard v. Carey
R+5.4
81% R
CO-3
Romero v. Hurd
R+5.6
82% R
VA-5
Perriello v. McGuire
R+6.0
87% R
NY-21
Gendebien v. Constantino
R+6.1
88% R
FL-27
Rodriguez v. Salazar
R+6.5
88% R
WA-5
Conroy v. Baumgartner
R+7.5
89% R
TN-9
Pearson v. Taylor
R+7.7
90% R
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
Table view

Every race, sortable

74 races
CandidatesRatingRaised (D / R)Cook
NY-3Suozzi v. LiPetriLIKELY DD+8.793% D——D+8.7R+3$3.2M / $297KLean D
NJ-9Pou v. PinoLIKELY DD+7.690% D——D+7.6Even—Likely D
TX-28Cuellar v. TijerinaLIKELY DD+7.090% DD+8.33D+2.5R+9$1.1M / $412KLean D
FL-14Castor v. BeltranLIKELY DD+6.987% DD+8.41D+4.8R+9$387K / —Tossup
OH-1Landsman v. ConroyLIKELY DD+6.786% DD+3.51D+11.0R+1$2.0M / $220KLean D
NE-2Powell v. HardingLIKELY DD+6.284% DD+3.61D+9.6D+6$1.2M / $1.2MLean D
NM-2Vasquez v. CunninghamLIKELY DD+5.783% DD+3.02D+10.0Even$1.7M / $508KLean D
NH-1Shaheen v. DiLorenzoLIKELY DD+5.481% DD+3.01D+8.7D+3$1.8M / $679KLikely D
OH-7Poindexter v. MillerLIKELY DD+5.284% DD+8.45R+10.0R+10$79K / $725KTossup
FL-25Moskowitz v. SingerLEAN DD+4.276% DD+6.41D+1.3R+8$903K / $1.1MTossup
AZ-1Shah v. FeelyLEAN DD+4.077% DD+2.42D+8.1R+2$1.1M / —Tossup
CA-48Wilpert v. DesmondLEAN DD+3.372% DD+1.32D+7.8D+5$881K / $1.6MLean D
NJ-7Bennett v. KeanLEAN DD+3.271% DD+4.42D+1.2Even$2.3M / $1.7MTossup
NC-1Davis v. BuckhoutLEAN DD+3.171% DD+3.14D+2.9R+10$1.3M / $185KLean R
TX-34Gonzalez v. FloresLEAN DD+2.468% DD+2.74D+1.3R+9$1.8M / $639KTossup
PA-7Brooks v. MackenzieLEAN DD+2.467% DD+3.52R+0.2R+2$664K / $852KTossup
CO-8Rutinel v. EvansLEAN DD+1.863% DD+2.02D+1.4Even$2.0M / $1.3MTossup
PA-10Stelson v. PerryLEAN DD+1.661% DD+2.83R+0.1R+4$2.8M / $1.4MTossup
TX-15Pulido v. CruzLEAN DD+1.662% DD+6.46R+14.7R+16$1.1M / $2.1MLean R
WA-3Perez v. BraunLEAN DD+1.561% DR+1.84D+8.8R+2$1.7M / $1.2MTossup
IA-1Bohannan v. Miller-MeeksTOSS-UPD+1.359% DD+4.61R+3.0R+7$3.7M / $2.0MTossup
OH-9Kaptur v. MerrinTOSS-UPD+1.359% DR+0.12D+3.5R+9$1.4M / $312KTossup
NC-11Ager v. BalkcomTOSS-UPD+1.157% DR+0.11D+2.7R+8$1.2M / —Lean R
NY-17Conley v. LawlerTOSS-UPD+1.158% DD+1.04D+1.4D+2$2.8M / $2.8MTossup
AZ-6Mendoza v. CiscomaniTOSS-UPD+0.755% DR+0.53D+2.8D+1$3.4M / $1.9MTossup
CA-22Villegas v. ValadaoTOSS-UPR+0.151% RD+0.61R+1.0Even$1.1M / $1.1MTossup
FL-7Dalton v. ElijahTOSS-UPR+0.151% R——R+0.1R+11$923K / —Likely R
WI-3Cooke v. OrdenTOSS-UPR+0.352% RD+0.44R+2.1R+6$4.4M / $2.2MTossup
FL-22Dandiya v. AskarTOSS-UPR+0.353% RR+1.03D+2.1R+9$1.2M / —Lean R
VA-1Taylor v. WittmanTOSS-UPR+0.654% RD+0.23R+2.8R+3$856K / $1.4MLean R
VA-2Luria v. KiggansTOSS-UPR+1.157% RR+3.41D+1.9D+1$1.6M / $1.8MTossup
MI-7Lawrence v. BarrettTOSS-UPR+1.259% RR+1.62R+0.4Even$440K / $1.7MTossup
IA-3Garriott v. NunnTOSS-UPR+1.258% RR+2.31D+0.1R+3$2.9M / $1.0MTossup
ME-2Dunlap v. LePageLEAN RR+1.562% RR+1.07R+3.9R+8$374K / $1.6MLikely R
MT-1Forstag v. FlintLEAN RR+1.662% RR+1.16R+4.0R+10$340K / $299KLikely R
AR-2Jones v. HillLEAN RR+2.366% RD+3.02R+12.1R+14$837K / $1.7MSafe R
MI-4McCann v. HuizengaLEAN RR+2.466% RR+2.04R+2.9R+4$1.1M / $1.1MLean R
PA-8Cognetti v. BresnahanLEAN RR+2.467% RR+2.12R+3.3R+7$2.3M / $1.2MTossup
MI-10Hines v. BouchardLEAN RR+2.566% RR+3.62R+0.9R+5$618K / $1.3MTossup
WI-1Berman v. SteilLEAN RR+2.567% RR+1.74R+4.4R+3$170K / $1.2MLikely R
IA-2James v. MitchellLEAN RR+2.567% RR+2.42R+2.8R+9$1.2M / $1.2MLean R
KY-6Dembo v. AlvaradoLEAN RR+2.971% RR+1.55R+7.4R+14$815K / $1.0MLikely R
FL-9Soto v. GreenLEAN RR+2.968% RR+3.71R+1.8R+16$329K / —Likely R
SC-1Lacore v. HoneycuttLEAN RR+3.172% RR+2.93R+3.9R+12$1.1M / $360KLikely R
MO-2Wellman v. WagnerLEAN RR+3.372% RR+1.72R+6.2R+6$366K / $1.5MLikely R
TX-35Garcia v. CruzLEAN RR+4.175% RR+4.91R+3.0R+9$425K / $344KLikely R
NV-2Benitez-Thompson v. FlippoLEAN RR+4.480% RR+3.23R+8.7R+12$60K / $555KSafe R
CO-5Killin v. CrankLEAN RR+4.577% RR+4.62R+4.2R+8$2.0M / $808KLikely R
PA-1Harvie v. FitzpatrickLIKELY RR+4.581% RR+5.85D+0.6D+2$987K / $1.3MLikely R
FL-16Kirschner v. GrutersLIKELY RR+4.680% RR+5.22R+3.1R+12$190K / —Safe R
AL-2Figures v. MarquesLIKELY RR+4.881% RR+3.63R+8.9R+13$174K / $1.2MLikely R
NY-1Gallant v. LaLotaLEAN RR+4.878% RR+6.11R+2.9R+9$423K / —Safe R
MN-1Johnson v. FinstadLEAN RR+4.879% RR+2.43R+8.4R+11$598K / $555KLikely R
FL-11Pericola v. StradaLEAN RR+4.979% RR+3.91R+6.2R+14$50K / —Safe R
FL-13Gray v. LunaLIKELY RR+5.083% RR+4.15R+8.9R+12$475K / $488KLikely R
TX-23Stout v. HerreraLIKELY RR+5.481% RR+5.11R+5.8R+13$87K / $21KLikely R
NE-1Backemeyer v. FloodLIKELY RR+5.483% RR+2.33R+11.3R+12$229K / $894KSafe R
OH-15Leonard v. CareyLIKELY RR+5.481% RR+3.63R+7.8R+9$229K / $650KLikely R
CO-3Romero v. HurdLIKELY RR+5.682% RR+4.61R+7.0R+8$353K / $1.8MLikely R
VA-5Perriello v. McGuireLIKELY RR+6.087% RR+5.54R+7.8R+11$1.2M / $705KSafe R
NY-21Gendebien v. ConstantinoLIKELY RR+6.188% RR+6.15R+5.8R+19$2.5M / —Safe R
FL-27Rodriguez v. SalazarLIKELY RR+6.588% RR+4.13R+13.0R+13$286K / $517KLikely R
AZ-2Nez v. CraneLIKELY RR+7.491% RR+5.83R+11.5R+13$1.8M / $5.6MLikely R
WA-5Conroy v. BaumgartnerLIKELY RR+7.589% RR+5.91R+9.6R+9$267K / $998KSafe R
TN-9Pearson v. TaylorLIKELY RR+7.790% RR+7.51R+8.0R+20$618K / —Safe R
GA-11Harden v. CowanLIKELY RR+7.990% RR+1.61R+16.4R+22$60K / $424KSafe R
IN-5Ford v. SpartzLIKELY RR+8.391% RR+5.31R+12.3R+15$422K / $562KSafe R
NC-3Smith v. MurphyLIKELY RR+8.892% RR+6.41R+11.9R+12$107K / $828KSafe R
NC-14Womack v. MooreLIKELY RR+8.892% RR+4.31R+14.9R+14$4K / $1.0MSafe R
OH-10Knickerbocker v. TurnerLIKELY RR+8.894% RR+9.42R+7.3R+6$86K / $329KLikely R
CO-4Laubacher v. BoebertLIKELY RR+9.494% R——R+9.4R+17$2.8M / $411KSafe R
NC-9Ojeda v. HudsonLIKELY RR+9.594% RR+7.91R+11.6R+14$550K / $646KSafe R
TX-9Gutierrez v. MealerLIKELY RR+9.594% RR+9.11R+10.1R+18$31K / —Safe R
NC-7Hardy v. RouzerLIKELY RR+10.095% RR+9.11R+11.2R+12$180K / $567KSafe R

Bold surname = incumbent running. Settled = only one major party is on the November ballot. Lean = presidential vote relative to the nation. Cook = Cook Political Report rating as listed on Wikipedia, shown for comparison only; it is not an input.