House Effects
Sunday, November 1, 20262 days until Election Day, November 3, 2026
2026 projections

The House

All 435 seats, on the lines in force this November, including the 9 states that redrew their maps since 2024. Only 110 districts have any public polling, so each projection starts from the district's 2024 presidential vote, the national environment, incumbency, the incumbent's last over- or under-performance, and the fundraising gap, then blends in district polls where they exist.

Democrats win control
91%
Democrats 91%, Republicans 9%; 218 seats make a majority.
Democratic seats, expected
232.7
An average over simulations, not a single forecast. 215 now; nine in ten simulations: 214 to 254.
201216231246261218 for Democratic control →10%
Democrats control Republicans controlDemocratic seats after the election, 40,000 simulations
Safe D 199Likely D 12Lean D 13Toss-up 12Lean R 21Likely R 17Safe R 161
The assumption that matters most: which way the polls miss
If…Democrats win controlRepublicans win controlDemocratic seats
No direction assumed (still carries the usual uncertainty)91%9%232.7
Polls overstate Democrats as they did, on average, in 2016–24 (1.6 points)77%23%225.9
Polls understate Democrats by the same amount (1.6 points)97%3%240.0

“No direction assumed” does not mean the polls are assumed to be exactly right: every row above, including that one, already carries the historical size of past misses as uncertainty (see Uncertainty) — the win probabilities and seat ranges everywhere on this page are built from that spread. It means only that the model does not bet on which direction the next miss runs, unlike the two rows below it. From 2016 through 2024 the projections this method would have made ran too Democratic on average; before that they ran about even, and in the 2025 governor's races the polls missed the other way. These rows show what a repeat of that pattern, or its mirror image, would mean on top of the uncertainty already built in.

Race by race

60 districts where either side has at least a 1-in-10 chance

The heavy rule is the majority line: the district just above it is the 218th most Democratic seat in the country. Far more Republican-held seats than Democratic ones sit near that line, which is why Democrats are favored overall even though the 218th seat itself is close to even. District polls are scarce and often sponsored; they get about half the weight in a polled district. How polls and fundamentals are blended.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
NC-11
Ager v. Balkcom
D+6.5
90% D
NM-2
Vasquez v. Cunningham
D+6.3
87% D
NH-1
Shaheen v. DiLorenzo
D+5.9
86% D
CA-22
Villegas v. Valadao
D+5.5
83% D
FL-14
Castor v. Beltran
D+5.1
81% D
TX-34
Gonzalez v. Flores
D+4.8
80% D
MI-7
Lawrence v. Barrett
D+4.1
77% D
NC-1
Davis v. Buckhout
D+3.6
77% D
NJ-7
Bennett v. Kean
D+3.6
73% D
PA-7
Brooks v. Mackenzie
D+3.6
77% D
OH-9
Kaptur v. Merrin
D+3.4
74% D
AZ-1
Shah v. Feely
D+3.2
74% D
TX-15
Pulido v. Cruz
D+3.1
73% D
▲ House majority: Democrats need every race above this line
VA-2
Luria v. Kiggans
D+2.6
67% D
CO-8
Rutinel v. Evans
D+2.0
65% D
PA-8
Cognetti v. Bresnahan
D+1.9
65% D
KY-6
Dembo v. Alvarado
D+1.6
63% D
FL-25
Moskowitz v. Singer
D+1.5
61% D
WA-3
Perez v. Braun
D+1.4
61% D
MT-1
Forstag v. Flint
D+1.1
59% D
PA-10
Stelson v. Perry
D+0.9
57% D
NY-17
Conley v. Lawler
D+0.7
56% D
AZ-6
Mendoza v. Ciscomani
D+0.5
54% D
IA-2
James v. Mitchell
D+0.5
53% D
WI-3
Cooke v. Orden
R+0.2
52% R
FL-22
Dandiya v. Askar
R+0.2
52% R
ME-2
Dunlap v. LePage
R+0.7
56% R
MO-2
Wellman v. Wagner
R+0.8
56% R
PA-1
Harvie v. Fitzpatrick
R+0.8
57% R
TX-35
Garcia v. Cruz
R+0.9
57% R
IA-3
Garriott v. Nunn
R+1.0
57% R
SC-1
Lacore v. Honeycutt
R+1.6
63% R
FL-7
Dalton v. Elijah
R+1.7
62% R
VA-1
Taylor v. Wittman
R+1.8
64% R
OH-7
Poindexter v. Miller
R+2.0
64% R
CO-5
Killin v. Crank
R+2.1
66% R
WI-1
Berman v. Steil
R+2.3
67% R
CO-3
Romero v. Hurd
R+2.3
66% R
FL-9
Soto v. Green
R+2.4
66% R
MN-1
Johnson v. Finstad
R+2.6
70% R
OH-10
Knickerbocker v. Turner
R+3.5
73% R
NY-21
Gendebien v. Constantino
R+3.5
76% R
AZ-2
Nez v. Crane
R+3.7
75% R
OH-15
Leonard v. Carey
R+3.8
74% R
MI-4
McCann v. Huizenga
R+4.0
77% R
IN-5
Ford v. Spartz
R+4.0
78% R
TX-23
Stout v. Herrera
R+4.2
77% R
NY-1
Gallant v. LaLota
R+4.3
77% R
FL-13
Gray v. Luna
R+4.3
79% R
MI-10
Hines v. Bouchard
R+4.4
78% R
AL-2
Figures v. Marques
R+4.5
79% R
FL-11
Pericola v. Strada
R+4.5
78% R
FL-16
Kirschner v. Gruters
R+4.7
81% R
NV-2
Benitez-Thompson v. Flippo
R+5.9
86% R
VA-5
Perriello v. McGuire
R+6.0
88% R
NE-1
Backemeyer v. Flood
R+6.3
87% R
FL-27
Rodriguez v. Salazar
R+6.7
90% R
AR-2
Jones v. Hill
R+7.1
89% R
TN-9
Pearson v. Taylor
R+7.4
89% R
WA-5
Conroy v. Baumgartner
R+7.4
89% R
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
Table view

Every race, sortable

75 races
CandidatesRatingRaised (D / R)Cook
NY-3Suozzi v. LiPetriLIKELY DD+9.795% D——D+9.7R+3$3.2M / $297KLean D
NJ-9Pou v. PinoLIKELY DD+8.392% D——D+8.3Even—Likely D
IA-1Bohannan v. Miller-MeeksLIKELY DD+8.192% DD+15.72R+2.5R+7$3.7M / $2.0MTossup
CA-48Wilpert v. DesmondLIKELY DD+8.194% DD+8.14D+8.3D+5$881K / $1.6MLean D
NV-3Lee v. O'DonnellLIKELY DD+7.991% DD+4.81D+12.2D+1$2.3M / $414KLean D
OH-1Landsman v. ConroyLIKELY DD+7.994% DD+6.84D+12.0R+1$2.0M / $220KLean D
NC-11Ager v. BalkcomLIKELY DD+6.590% DD+7.43D+3.8R+8$1.2M / —Lean R
NM-2Vasquez v. CunninghamLIKELY DD+6.387% DD+3.93D+10.9Even$1.7M / $508KLean D
NH-1Shaheen v. DiLorenzoLIKELY DD+5.986% DD+4.02D+9.3D+3$1.8M / $679KLikely D
CA-22Villegas v. ValadaoLIKELY DD+5.583% DD+10.02R+0.6Even$1.1M / $1.1MTossup
FL-14Castor v. BeltranLIKELY DD+5.181% DD+4.62D+5.9R+9$387K / —Tossup
TX-34Gonzalez v. FloresLIKELY DD+4.880% DD+6.45D+2.2R+9$1.8M / $639KTossup
MI-7Lawrence v. BarrettLEAN DD+4.177% DD+6.93R+0.1Even$440K / $1.7MTossup
NC-1Davis v. BuckhoutLEAN DD+3.677% DD+3.68D+3.8R+10$1.3M / $185KLean R
NJ-7Bennett v. KeanLEAN DD+3.673% DD+5.02D+1.7Even$2.3M / $1.7MTossup
PA-7Brooks v. MackenzieLEAN DD+3.677% DD+4.35D+0.2R+2$664K / $852KTossup
OH-9Kaptur v. MerrinLEAN DD+3.474% DD+2.93D+4.4R+9$1.4M / $312KTossup
AZ-1Shah v. FeelyLEAN DD+3.274% DD+1.23D+9.1R+2$1.1M / —Tossup
TX-15Pulido v. CruzLEAN DD+3.173% DD+7.47R+14.2R+16$1.1M / $2.1MLean R
VA-2Luria v. KiggansLEAN DD+2.667% DD+2.82D+2.3D+1$1.6M / $1.8MTossup
CO-8Rutinel v. EvansLEAN DD+2.065% DD+2.12D+1.9Even$2.0M / $1.3MTossup
PA-8Cognetti v. BresnahanLEAN DD+1.965% DD+3.05R+2.8R+7$2.3M / $1.2MTossup
KY-6Dembo v. AlvaradoLEAN DD+1.663% DD+3.19R+6.7R+14$815K / $1.0MLikely R
FL-25Moskowitz v. SingerLEAN DD+1.561% DD+1.34D+2.0R+8$903K / $1.1MTossup
WA-3Perez v. BraunLEAN DD+1.461% DR+2.05D+9.5R+2$1.7M / $1.2MTossup
MT-1Forstag v. FlintTOSS-UPD+1.159% DD+1.710R+3.3R+10$340K / $299KLikely R
PA-10Stelson v. PerryTOSS-UPD+0.957% DD+1.06D+0.4R+4$2.8M / $1.4MTossup
NY-17Conley v. LawlerTOSS-UPD+0.756% DD+0.45D+1.8D+2$2.8M / $2.8MTossup
AZ-6Mendoza v. CiscomaniTOSS-UPD+0.554% DR+1.53D+3.3D+1$3.4M / $1.9MTossup
IA-2James v. MitchellTOSS-UPD+0.553% DD+2.43R+2.2R+9$1.2M / $1.2MLean R
WI-3Cooke v. OrdenTOSS-UPR+0.252% RD+0.44R+1.6R+6$4.4M / $2.2MTossup
FL-22Dandiya v. AskarTOSS-UPR+0.252% RR+1.23D+3.2R+9$1.2M / —Lean R
ME-2Dunlap v. LePageTOSS-UPR+0.756% RD+0.28R+3.4R+8$374K / $1.6MLikely R
MO-2Wellman v. WagnerTOSS-UPR+0.856% RD+0.84R+5.9R+6$366K / $1.5MLikely R
PA-1Harvie v. FitzpatrickTOSS-UPR+0.857% RR+1.38D+1.0D+2$987K / $1.3MLikely R
TX-35Garcia v. CruzTOSS-UPR+0.957% RR+0.64R+2.3R+9$425K / $344KLikely R
IA-3Garriott v. NunnTOSS-UPR+1.057% RR+2.31D+0.7R+3$2.9M / $1.0MTossup
SC-1Lacore v. HoneycuttLEAN RR+1.663% RR+1.15R+3.2R+12$1.1M / $360KLikely R
FL-7Dalton v. ElijahLEAN RR+1.762% RR+3.71D+0.9R+11$923K / —Likely R
VA-1Taylor v. WittmanLEAN RR+1.864% RR+1.65R+2.4R+3$856K / $1.4MLean R
OH-7Poindexter v. MillerLEAN RR+2.064% RD+2.66R+9.7R+10$79K / $725KTossup
CO-5Killin v. CrankLEAN RR+2.166% RR+1.54R+3.6R+8$2.0M / $808KLikely R
WI-1Berman v. SteilLEAN RR+2.367% RR+1.54R+4.2R+3$170K / $1.2MLikely R
CO-3Romero v. HurdLEAN RR+2.366% RD+0.92R+6.7R+8$353K / $1.8MLikely R
FL-9Soto v. GreenLEAN RR+2.466% RR+3.62R+0.7R+16$329K / —Likely R
MN-1Johnson v. FinstadLEAN RR+2.670% RR+1.15R+7.9R+11$598K / $555KLikely R
OH-10Knickerbocker v. TurnerLEAN RR+3.573% RR+1.13R+6.9R+6$86K / $329KLikely R
NY-21Gendebien v. ConstantinoLEAN RR+3.576% RR+3.38R+4.6R+19$2.5M / —Safe R
AZ-2Nez v. CraneLEAN RR+3.775% RD+0.44R+11.1R+13$1.8M / $5.6MLikely R
OH-15Leonard v. CareyLEAN RR+3.874% RR+1.14R+7.4R+9$229K / $650KLikely R
MI-4McCann v. HuizengaLEAN RR+4.077% RR+4.75R+2.5R+4$1.1M / $1.1MLean R
IN-5Ford v. SpartzLEAN RR+4.078% RR+0.83R+11.8R+15$422K / $562KSafe R
TX-23Stout v. HerreraLEAN RR+4.277% RR+3.62R+5.0R+13$87K / $21KLikely R
NY-1Gallant v. LaLotaLEAN RR+4.377% RR+5.91R+2.1R+9$423K / —Safe R
FL-13Gray v. LunaLEAN RR+4.379% RR+2.36R+8.4R+12$475K / $488KLikely R
MI-10Hines v. BouchardLEAN RR+4.478% RR+7.03R+0.4R+5$618K / $1.3MTossup
AL-2Figures v. MarquesLEAN RR+4.579% RR+2.14R+8.4R+13$174K / $1.2MLikely R
FL-11Pericola v. StradaLEAN RR+4.578% RR+3.81R+5.4R+14$50K / —Safe R
FL-16Kirschner v. GrutersLIKELY RR+4.781% RR+5.92R+2.2R+12$190K / —Safe R
NV-2Benitez-Thompson v. FlippoLIKELY RR+5.986% RR+4.83R+8.3R+12$60K / $555KSafe R
VA-5Perriello v. McGuireLIKELY RR+6.088% RR+5.64R+7.2R+11$1.2M / $705KSafe R
NE-1Backemeyer v. FloodLIKELY RR+6.387% RR+3.64R+10.9R+12$229K / $894KSafe R
TX-9Gutierrez v. MealerLIKELY RR+6.690% RR+5.73R+9.3R+18$31K / —Safe R
FL-27Rodriguez v. SalazarLIKELY RR+6.790% RR+4.33R+12.5R+13$286K / $517KLikely R
AR-2Jones v. HillLIKELY RR+7.189% RR+4.13R+11.6R+14$837K / $1.7MSafe R
TN-9Pearson v. TaylorLIKELY RR+7.489% RR+7.71R+6.9R+20$618K / —Safe R
WA-5Conroy v. BaumgartnerLIKELY RR+7.489% RR+6.01R+9.2R+9$267K / $998KSafe R
GA-11Harden v. CowanLIKELY RR+7.790% RR+1.61R+15.8R+22$60K / $424KSafe R
CO-4Laubacher v. BoebertLIKELY RR+8.592% RR+8.31R+8.7R+17$2.8M / $411KSafe R
NC-9Ojeda v. HudsonLIKELY RR+8.693% RR+7.02R+11.1R+14$550K / $646KSafe R
NC-3Smith v. MurphyLIKELY RR+8.893% RR+6.61R+11.6R+12$107K / $828KSafe R
NC-14Womack v. MooreLIKELY RR+8.893% RR+4.31R+14.8R+14$4K / $1.0MSafe R
GA-7Kozycki v. McCormickLIKELY RR+9.594% RR+2.02R+19.4R+21$50K / $395KSafe R
TN-5Molder v. HatcherLIKELY RR+9.695% RR+8.52R+11.0R+22$1.9M / $396KSafe R
NC-7Hardy v. RouzerLIKELY RR+9.795% RR+8.91R+10.8R+12$180K / $567KSafe R

Bold surname = incumbent running. Settled = only one major party is on the November ballot. Lean = presidential vote relative to the nation. Cook = Cook Political Report rating as listed on Wikipedia, shown for comparison only; it is not an input.