House Effects
Monday, September 21, 202643 days until Election Day, November 3, 2026
2026 projections

The House

All 435 seats, on the lines in force this November, including the 9 states that redrew their maps since 2024. Only 81 districts have any public polling, so each projection starts from the district's 2024 presidential vote, the national environment, incumbency, the incumbent's last over- or under-performance, and the fundraising gap, then blends in district polls where they exist.

Democrats win control
80%
Democrats 80%, Republicans 20%; 218 seats make a majority.
Democratic seats, expected
227.0
An average over simulations, not a single forecast. 215 now; nine in ten simulations: 209 to 248.
198213216228243258218 for Democratic control →11%
Democrats control Republicans controlDemocratic seats after the election, 40,000 simulations
Safe D 197Likely D 11Lean D 6Toss-up 16Lean R 17Likely R 24Safe R 164
The assumption that matters most: which way the polls miss
If…Democrats win controlRepublicans win controlDemocratic seats
No direction assumed (still carries the usual uncertainty)80%20%227.0
Polls overstate Democrats as they did, on average, in 2016–24 (1.8 points)59%41%220.5
Polls understate Democrats by the same amount (1.8 points)92%8%234.4

“No direction assumed” does not mean the polls are assumed to be exactly right: every row above, including that one, already carries the historical size of past misses as uncertainty (see Uncertainty) — the win probabilities and seat ranges everywhere on this page are built from that spread. It means only that the model does not bet on which direction the next miss runs, unlike the two rows below it. From 2016 through 2024 the projections this method would have made ran too Democratic on average; before that they ran about even, and in the 2025 governor's races the polls missed the other way. These rows show what a repeat of that pattern, or its mirror image, would mean on top of the uncertainty already built in.

Race by race

62 districts where either side has at least a 1-in-10 chance

The heavy rule is the majority line: the district just above it is the 218th most Democratic seat in the country. Far more Republican-held seats than Democratic ones sit near that line, which is why Democrats are favored overall even though the 218th seat itself is close to even. District polls are scarce and often sponsored; they get about half the weight in a polled district. How polls and fundamentals are blended.

Race
D+20EvenR+20
Proj.
NJ-9
Pou v. Pino
D+7.6
90% D
FL-14
Castor v. Beltran
D+6.9
87% D
OH-1
Landsman v. Conroy
D+6.8
86% D
TX-28
Cuellar v. Tijerina
D+6.4
88% D
NE-2
Powell v. Harding
D+5.9
83% D
NM-2
Vasquez v. Cunningham
D+5.4
82% D
OH-7
Poindexter v. Miller
D+5.0
83% D
FL-25
Moskowitz v. Singer
D+4.2
75% D
NJ-7
Bennett v. Kean
D+3.1
71% D
NC-1
Davis v. Buckhout
D+2.9
70% D
CA-48
Wilpert v. Desmond
D+2.9
69% D
TX-34
Gonzalez v. Flores
D+2.3
67% D
PA-10
Stelson v. Perry
D+1.6
61% D
OH-9
Kaptur v. Merrin
D+1.4
59% D
CO-8
Rutinel v. Evans
D+1.4
60% D
IA-1
Bohannan v. Miller-Meeks
D+1.3
58% D
AZ-6
Mendoza v. Ciscomani
D+1.0
57% D
House majority: Democrats need every race above this line
NC-11
Ager v. Balkcom
D+0.9
56% D
PA-7
Brooks v. Mackenzie
D+0.3
52% D
TX-15
Pulido v. Cruz
D+0.3
52% D
WA-3
Perez v. Braun
Even
50% D
CA-22
Villegas v. Valadao
R+0.1
51% R
FL-7
Dalton v. Elijah
R+0.1
51% R
FL-22
Dandiya v. Askar
R+0.4
53% R
WI-3
Cooke v. Orden
R+0.5
54% R
NY-17
Conley v. Lawler
R+0.6
55% R
VA-2
Luria v. Kiggans
R+1.2
57% R
IA-3
Garriott v. Nunn
R+1.3
58% R
MI-7
Lawrence v. Barrett
R+1.3
59% R
MI-4
McCann v. Huizenga
R+1.5
60% R
AR-2
Jones v. Hill
R+2.2
65% R
MI-10
Hines v. Bouchard
R+2.5
66% R
PA-8
Cognetti v. Bresnahan
R+2.5
67% R
IA-2
James v. Mitchell
R+2.5
67% R
FL-9
Soto v. Green
R+2.8
68% R
FL-16
Kirschner v. Gruters
R+2.8
68% R
MT-1
Forstag v. Flint
R+2.9
71% R
ME-2
Dunlap v. LePage
R+3.5
74% R
VA-1
Taylor v. Wittman
R+3.8
73% R
TX-35
Garcia v. Cruz
R+3.9
74% R
NV-2
Benitez-Thompson v. Flippo
R+4.2
78% R
CO-5
Killin v. Crank
R+4.5
77% R
PA-1
Harvie v. Fitzpatrick
R+4.5
80% R
KY-6
Dembo v. Alvarado
R+4.6
80% R
WI-1
Berman v. Steil
R+4.6
78% R
SC-1
Lacore v. Honeycutt
R+4.7
80% R
AL-2
Figures v. Marques
R+4.9
82% R
FL-11
Pericola v. Strada
R+4.9
79% R
NY-1
Gallant v. LaLota
R+5.0
79% R
FL-13
Gray v. Luna
R+5.0
83% R
NE-1
Backemeyer v. Flood
R+5.4
83% R
TX-23
Stout v. Herrera
R+5.6
82% R
CO-3
Romero v. Hurd
R+5.7
82% R
NY-21
Gendebien v. Constantino
R+6.2
88% R
FL-27
Rodriguez v. Salazar
R+6.4
87% R
MO-2
Wellman v. Wagner
R+6.5
85% R
MN-1
Johnson v. Finstad
R+7.0
89% R
VA-5
Perriello v. McGuire
R+7.1
87% R
WA-5
Conroy v. Baumgartner
R+7.4
88% R
TN-9
Pearson v. Taylor
R+7.6
89% R
OH-15
Leonard v. Carey
R+7.6
89% R
GA-11
Harden v. Cowan
R+8.0
90% R
projected margin (polls + fundamentals) polls alone half of simulated outcomes nine in ten outcomes
Table view

Every race, sortable

74 races
CandidatesRatingRaised (D / R)Cook
MN-2Little v. PrattLIKELY DD+9.894% DD+8.31D+11.9D+7$442K / $160KLikely D
NY-3Suozzi v. LiPetriLIKELY DD+8.793% DD+8.7R+3$3.2M / $297KLean D
NH-1Shaheen v. DiLorenzoLIKELY DD+8.793% DD+8.7D+3$1.8M / $679KLikely D
AZ-1Shah v. FeelyLIKELY DD+8.191% DD+8.1R+2$1.1M / —Tossup
NJ-9Pou v. PinoLIKELY DD+7.690% DD+7.6EvenLikely D
FL-14Castor v. BeltranLIKELY DD+6.987% DD+8.51D+4.8R+9$387K / —Tossup
OH-1Landsman v. ConroyLIKELY DD+6.886% DD+3.61D+11.0R+1$2.0M / $220KLean D
TX-28Cuellar v. TijerinaLIKELY DD+6.488% DD+7.53D+2.5R+9$1.1M / $412KLean D
NE-2Powell v. HardingLIKELY DD+5.983% DD+3.11D+9.6D+6$1.2M / $1.2MLean D
NM-2Vasquez v. CunninghamLIKELY DD+5.482% DD+2.92D+10.0Even$1.7M / $508KLean D
OH-7Poindexter v. MillerLIKELY DD+5.083% DD+8.15R+10.0R+10$79K / $725KTossup
FL-25Moskowitz v. SingerLEAN DD+4.275% DD+6.41D+1.3R+8$903K / $1.1MTossup
NJ-7Bennett v. KeanLEAN DD+3.171% DD+4.12D+1.2Even$2.3M / $1.7MTossup
NC-1Davis v. BuckhoutLEAN DD+2.970% DD+2.94D+2.8R+10$1.3M / $185KLean R
CA-48Wilpert v. DesmondLEAN DD+2.969% DD+0.82D+7.8D+5$881K / $1.6MLean D
TX-34Gonzalez v. FloresLEAN DD+2.367% DD+2.54D+1.3R+9$1.8M / $639KTossup
PA-10Stelson v. PerryLEAN DD+1.661% DD+2.62R+0.1R+4$2.8M / $1.4MTossup
OH-9Kaptur v. MerrinTOSS-UPD+1.459% DR+0.11D+3.5R+9$1.4M / $312KTossup
CO-8Rutinel v. EvansTOSS-UPD+1.460% DD+1.4Even$2.0M / $1.3MTossup
IA-1Bohannan v. Miller-MeeksTOSS-UPD+1.358% DD+4.51R+3.1R+7$3.7M / $2.0MTossup
AZ-6Mendoza v. CiscomaniTOSS-UPD+1.057% DD+0.23D+2.8D+1$3.4M / $1.9MTossup
NC-11Ager v. BalkcomTOSS-UPD+0.956% DR+0.51D+2.7R+8$1.2M / —Lean R
PA-7Brooks v. MackenzieTOSS-UPD+0.352% DD+0.71R+0.2R+2$664K / $852KTossup
TX-15Pulido v. CruzTOSS-UPD+0.352% DD+3.45R+14.7R+16$1.1M / $2.1MLean R
WA-3Perez v. BraunTOSS-UPEven50% DR+4.13D+8.8R+2$1.7M / $1.2MTossup
CA-22Villegas v. ValadaoTOSS-UPR+0.151% RD+0.51R+1.0Even$1.1M / $1.1MTossup
FL-7Dalton v. ElijahTOSS-UPR+0.151% RR+0.1R+11$923K / —Likely R
FL-22Dandiya v. AskarTOSS-UPR+0.453% RR+1.13D+2.1R+9$1.2M / —Lean R
WI-3Cooke v. OrdenTOSS-UPR+0.554% RD+0.14R+2.2R+6$4.4M / $2.2MTossup
NY-17Conley v. LawlerTOSS-UPR+0.655% RR+1.42D+1.4D+2$2.8M / $2.8MTossup
VA-2Luria v. KiggansTOSS-UPR+1.257% RR+3.51D+1.9D+1$1.6M / $1.8MTossup
IA-3Garriott v. NunnTOSS-UPR+1.358% RR+2.31D+0.1R+3$2.9M / $1.0MTossup
MI-7Lawrence v. BarrettTOSS-UPR+1.359% RR+1.72R+0.4Even$440K / $1.7MTossup
MI-4McCann v. HuizengaLEAN RR+1.560% RR+0.93R+2.9R+4$1.1M / $1.1MLean R
AR-2Jones v. HillLEAN RR+2.265% RD+2.52R+12.1R+14$837K / $1.7MSafe R
MI-10Hines v. BouchardLEAN RR+2.566% RR+3.62R+0.9R+5$618K / $1.3MTossup
PA-8Cognetti v. BresnahanLEAN RR+2.567% RR+2.23R+3.3R+7$2.3M / $1.2MTossup
IA-2James v. MitchellLEAN RR+2.567% RR+2.32R+2.8R+9$1.2M / $1.2MLean R
FL-9Soto v. GreenLEAN RR+2.868% RR+3.61R+1.8R+16$329K / —Likely R
FL-16Kirschner v. GrutersLEAN RR+2.868% RR+2.61R+3.1R+12$190K / —Safe R
MT-1Forstag v. FlintLEAN RR+2.971% RR+2.74R+4.0R+10$340K / $299KLikely R
ME-2Dunlap v. LePageLEAN RR+3.574% RR+3.44R+3.9R+8$374K / $1.6MLikely R
VA-1Taylor v. WittmanLEAN RR+3.873% RR+4.32R+2.9R+3$856K / $1.4MLean R
TX-35Garcia v. CruzLEAN RR+3.974% RR+4.61R+3.0R+9$425K / $344KLikely R
NV-2Benitez-Thompson v. FlippoLEAN RR+4.278% RR+3.03R+8.7R+12$60K / $555KSafe R
CO-5Killin v. CrankLEAN RR+4.577% RR+4.72R+4.2R+8$2.0M / $808KLikely R
PA-1Harvie v. FitzpatrickLIKELY RR+4.580% RR+5.95D+0.6D+2$987K / $1.3MLikely R
KY-6Dembo v. AlvaradoLIKELY RR+4.680% RR+3.94R+7.4R+14$815K / $1.0MLikely R
WI-1Berman v. SteilLEAN RR+4.678% RR+4.72R+4.4R+3$170K / $1.2MLikely R
SC-1Lacore v. HoneycuttLEAN RR+4.780% RR+4.92R+4.0R+12$1.1M / $360KLikely R
AL-2Figures v. MarquesLIKELY RR+4.982% RR+3.83R+8.9R+13$174K / $1.2MLikely R
FL-11Pericola v. StradaLEAN RR+4.979% RR+3.91R+6.2R+14$50K / —Safe R
NY-1Gallant v. LaLotaLEAN RR+5.079% RR+6.51R+3.0R+9$423K / —Safe R
FL-13Gray v. LunaLIKELY RR+5.083% RR+4.15R+8.9R+12$475K / $488KLikely R
NE-1Backemeyer v. FloodLIKELY RR+5.483% RR+2.93R+11.3R+12$229K / $894KSafe R
TX-23Stout v. HerreraLIKELY RR+5.682% RR+5.51R+5.8R+13$87K / $21KLikely R
CO-3Romero v. HurdLIKELY RR+5.782% RR+4.61R+7.0R+8$353K / $1.8MLikely R
NY-21Gendebien v. ConstantinoLIKELY RR+6.288% RR+6.25R+5.8R+19$2.5M / —Safe R
FL-27Rodriguez v. SalazarLIKELY RR+6.487% RR+4.13R+13.0R+13$286K / $517KLikely R
MO-2Wellman v. WagnerLIKELY RR+6.585% RR+6.81R+6.2R+6$366K / $1.5MLikely R
MN-1Johnson v. FinstadLIKELY RR+7.089% RR+6.42R+8.4R+11$598K / $555KLikely R
VA-5Perriello v. McGuireLIKELY RR+7.187% RR+6.61R+7.8R+11$1.2M / $705KSafe R
WA-5Conroy v. BaumgartnerLIKELY RR+7.488% RR+5.71R+9.6R+9$267K / $998KSafe R
AZ-2Nez v. CraneLIKELY RR+7.591% RR+6.03R+11.5R+13$1.8M / $5.6MLikely R
TN-9Pearson v. TaylorLIKELY RR+7.689% RR+7.31R+8.0R+20$618K / —Safe R
OH-15Leonard v. CareyLIKELY RR+7.689% RR+7.52R+7.8R+9$229K / $650KLikely R
GA-11Harden v. CowanLIKELY RR+8.090% RR+1.61R+16.4R+22$60K / $424KSafe R
IN-5Ford v. SpartzLIKELY RR+8.591% RR+5.71R+12.3R+15$422K / $562KSafe R
NC-3Smith v. MurphyLIKELY RR+8.892% RR+6.51R+12.0R+12$107K / $828KSafe R
NC-14Womack v. MooreLIKELY RR+8.892% RR+4.31R+14.9R+14$4K / $1.0MSafe R
OH-10Knickerbocker v. TurnerLIKELY RR+8.994% RR+9.52R+7.3R+6$86K / $329KLikely R
NC-9Ojeda v. HudsonLIKELY RR+9.493% RR+7.71R+11.6R+14$550K / $646KSafe R
CO-4Laubacher v. BoebertLIKELY RR+9.494% RR+9.4R+17$2.8M / $411KSafe R
NC-7Hardy v. RouzerLIKELY RR+10.295% RR+9.51R+11.2R+12$180K / $567KSafe R

Bold surname = incumbent running. Settled = only one major party is on the November ballot. Lean = presidential vote relative to the nation. Cook = Cook Political Report rating as listed on Wikipedia, shown for comparison only; it is not an input.