The 4-year graduation rate is no longer a meaningful comparison
The question
Is New York City's 4-year high-school graduation rate still useful for distinguishing one school from another?
NYC's 4-year high-school graduation rate distribution has compressed: median 87%, with three-quarters of high schools graduating between 79% and 95% of their students. The metric doesn't differentiate well between schools above the median — two schools at 88% and 92% are statistically indistinguishable on graduation alone. Compression has multiple drivers (credit recovery programs, consolidation of diploma pathways, policy emphasis since 2014). Readers wanting to distinguish high schools above 85% need to look at additional outcomes: college matriculation, college persistence, NY State's College & Career Readiness measure.
Data analysis
Investigation run 2026-05-30.
TL;DR
NYC's 4-year graduation rate distribution has compressed. Median is 87%; the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile) is just 79% to 95%. The rate doesn't differentiate well between schools above the median, and even within the bottom 25%, the spread is narrow (53% at p10). Readers wanting to distinguish HS above ~85% need to look at additional outcomes (college matriculation, persistence, CCR).
Distribution of NYC high-school 4-year graduation rates (2020-21)
Only 10% of NYC high schools graduate fewer than 54% of their students; only 10% graduate above 99%. The middle 80% lives between 54% and 99% — a 45-point range, but the right tail is heavily compressed near the ceiling.
Why this matters
When three-quarters of schools graduate 79% or more of their students, the rate stops distinguishing schools above the median. Two high schools at 88% and 92% are statistically indistinguishable on this measure. A reader trying to tell schools above 85% apart from each other needs to look at other outcomes.
What's behind the compression
Three forces appear to drive it. First, credit recovery — online makeup courses that allow students to complete graduation requirements outside traditional course sequences. Second, consolidation of diploma pathways — fewer below-Regents options. Third, New York City's policy emphasis on raising graduation rates since 2014. Whether the compression signals improvement, less-rigorous standards, or both depends on what a reader expects a diploma to certify.
Better measures to use instead
1. College enrollment rate (CUNY and SUNY publish this; New York City high-school-level data exists). 2. College persistence — share of students returning for a second year. 3. College graduation rate, six years out. 4. Share of students earning a Regents diploma versus a Local diploma. 5. College and Career Readiness, a measure defined by New York State and available in the city's School Quality Reports (not yet in our database).
Caveats
Our data has the 4-year August cohort graduation rate from New York City Open Data, one cohort behind the latest state publication. The College and Career Readiness measure isn't loaded yet.
What's next
Add the College and Career Readiness measure from the city's School Quality Reports. Connect New York City high-school codes with CUNY's freshman cohort data. Identify schools with a 95%+ graduation rate but a college-and-career-readiness rate below 30% — those are the schools graduating students who aren't being prepared for what's next.
Methodology & replication recipe — the data sources, queries, and steps behind this analysis.
More on specific schools
- Six NYC schools where 100% of teachers say students bully each other
- The Brooklyn New School lost 52 points of math proficiency in six years
- Bronx Aerospace High School cut chronic absenteeism by 34 points. How?
- The Anderson School scores at the ceiling — and proves nothing
- Two MS within a half-mile: one screens, one zones. Same neighborhood, different futures.