Loading…
Now which job would you take? FIRST JOB: This job would guarantee your current total family income for life. SECOND JOB: This job is better paying, but the income is also less certain. Suppose the chances were 50-50 that this job would double your lifetime income, and 50-50 that it would cut it in half.
Choice between guaranteed income and risky job, 50% loss · Asked in 1 wave, 2013 · 621 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
| Group | This job would guarantee your current total family income for life. | This job is better paying, but the income is also less certain. Suppose the chan | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 39% | 61% | 621 | ±5 | |
| Northeast | 30% | 70% | 112 | ±11 | |
| Midwest |
SHED 2013 · US adults 18+. Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHED 2013 | 2013-09-01 to 2013-09-30 | web | 4,134 | 621 |
| 49% |
| 51% |
| 121 |
| ±11 |
| South | 38% | 62% | 223 | ±8 |
| West | 39% | 61% | 165 | ±10 |