← All stories

COVID recoverymedium

Why is elementary chronic absenteeism stuck above pre-COVID?

The question

Why is chronic absenteeism at New York City elementary schools still well above pre-pandemic levels, when high-school attendance has nearly recovered?

New York City elementary chronic absenteeism rose from 27% in 2018-19 to 34% in 2024-25 — a 7-percentage-point jump that the post-pandemic recovery hasn't undone. K-8 schools fared worst (+10 points). High schools, where students mostly make their own attendance decisions, fared best (+3.5). The pattern fits a shift in family attendance norms post-COVID more than a student-engagement story: where parents make the call, attendance has slipped most. Whether the new floor should be treated as the baseline or as a problem to solve depends on how readers weigh attendance against the reasons families now choose to miss days.

Read the full briefing

Data analysis

Investigation run 2026-05-31.

TL;DR

New York City elementary chronic absenteeism averaged 26.9% in 2018-19 and 34.3% in 2024-25 — a 7.4-percentage-point jump. K-8 schools fared worst (+10 points); high schools recovered best (+3.5). The students whose attendance is decided by parents are the ones most affected by the new normal — consistent with parent attendance norms loosening during the pandemic and not retightening.

Chronic absenteeism change by grade band (2018-19 → 2024-25)

Detail: pre vs post by band

Bandn2018-192024-25Δ
Elementary63726.934.3+7.4
Middle school23724.333.5+9.2
K-816425.235.2+10.0
High school4063639.5+3.5
District 755551.858.3+6.5
K-12416.325.8+9.4
Change in chronic absenteeism by grade band (positive = more absent post-COVID)
K-8 schools
+10.0n=164
Middle schools
+9.2n=237
K-12 schools
+9.4n=4
Elementary
+7.4n=637
District 75 (sped)
+6.5n=55
High schools
+3.5n=406

The parent-norm hypothesis

High-school students mostly make their own attendance decisions, and their attendance has recovered to near the pre-pandemic baseline. Elementary attendance is mostly decided by parents and is 7 percentage points worse than before the pandemic. The straightforward reading: parents' decisions about whether a given day warrants attendance have shifted since 2019 — for minor illness, family travel, mental-health days, weather, scheduling conflicts. The pandemic normalized the option of an elective absence. Whether that shift is a problem depends on how readers weigh attendance against the reasons families now choose to miss days.

K-8 schools hit hardest

K-8 schools cover the most pandemic-disrupted middle grades and the parent-dependent elementary grades. The combination produces a +10-point shift. Standalone middle schools also shifted up (+9.2 points), which says the middle grades themselves are part of the story. Pure elementaries shifted +7.4 points, which supports the parent-norm story specifically for that level.

Levers that have been tried

First, the city's 'every day counts' campaign — limited measurable effect to date. Second, attendance teachers, deployed only at the highest-need schools. Third, tightening doctor-note requirements — has been proposed and faces strong opposition. Fourth, direct communication to parents about the cumulative cost of single absences — Johns Hopkins researcher Robert Balfanz has reported effects at scale. Each lever has costs as well as benefits; whether the net is positive depends on what trade-offs readers will accept.

What's next

A grade-by-grade breakdown within elementary (first grade vs. fifth grade) would clarify whether the youngest grades are taking the biggest hit. Interview Robert Balfanz about which parent-engagement interventions have worked at scale.

Methodology & replication recipe — the data sources, queries, and steps behind this analysis.

More on covid recovery