Loading…
Rating of relations between coworkers or colleagues in the respondent's workplace on a very good to very bad scale.
AI-matched An AI model grouped these questions and mapped their answers onto shared categories, and a second AI review checked and corrected the grouping and mapping. No person has checked it: compare the question wordings and the answer mapping below before reading the lines against each other.
Latest: 0% answered “Very bad” in GSS: Quality of relations among coworkers at firm, 2016.
Shares of people whose answer maps onto these categories (non-answers and answers outside the scale are left out), because surveys differ in whether they offer “don’t know.” Each column is one survey wave, evenly spaced rather than to scale in time; hover for exact shares.
Shares of people whose answer maps onto these categories (non-answers and answers outside the scale are left out), because surveys differ in whether they offer “don’t know.” Each point is one survey wave at the middle of its field period. Lines from different surveys are never spliced together.
Groups differ from everyone by 5 points on average across all answers, in GSS: Quality of relations among coworkers at firm.
| Line | Question | Match | How answers map |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSS: Quality of relations among coworkers at firm | Quality of relations among coworkers at firm In general how would you describe relations in your work place…
B. between co-workers/colleagues? Caveat: Asked as part of a battery of workplace relations items (part B). | identical | Very good → Very good; Quite good → Quite good; Neither good nor bad → Neither good nor bad; Quite bad → Quite bad; Very bad → Very bad |
| GSS: Relations between coworkers at workplace | Relations between coworkers at workplace In general how would you describe relations in your work place between coworkers/colleagues? Caveat: Code 1 is labeled just 'very', presumably 'very good'; asked as a standalone item. | equivalent | Very → Very good; Quite good → Quite good; Neither good nor bad → Neither good nor bad; Quite bad → Quite bad; Very bad → Very bad |
Groups differ from everyone by 5 points on average across all answers, in GSS: Quality of relations among coworkers at firm.
Subgroup charts are picked automatically. Of every breakdown in the data (party, ideology, age, sex, race, education, income, region, religion, and community type), these two put their groups furthest from everyone’s answers: the gap is averaged across all answer categories and waves, with each group weighted by its share of respondents. Party and ideology count as one choice, so the second chart shows a different kind of split. Groups with an effective sample under 50 in a wave are left out of that wave.