Loading…
What was the problem? Check all that apply. [Registration]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Voting problem: registration · Asked in 1 wave, 2024 · 1,068 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 24% | 76% | 1068 | ±6 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±57 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±32 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±45 |
| AZ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±52 |
| CA | 21% | 79% | 120 | ±12 | |
Cooperative Election Study 2024 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Election Study 2024 | 2024-10-01 to 2024-12-09 | web | 60,000 | 1,068 |
| CO † |
| 3% |
| 97% |
| 33 |
| ±20 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±35 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±60 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±93 |
| FL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 58 | ±26 |
| GA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 36 | ±23 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±37 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±56 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±75 |
| IL † | 16% | 84% | 75 | ±14 |
| IN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±34 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±69 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±45 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±38 |
| MA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±35 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±35 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±49 |
| MI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 38 | ±34 |
| MN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±25 |
| MO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±50 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±46 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±75 |
| NC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 44 | ±28 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±57 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±49 |
| NJ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 19 | ±38 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±40 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±44 |
| NY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 47 | ±29 |
| OH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 39 | ±39 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±49 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±45 |
| PA † | 27% | 73% | 40 | ±19 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±69 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±35 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±28 |
| TX † | 32% | 68% | 74 | ±17 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±37 |
| VA † | 2% | 98% | 36 | ±19 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±46 |
| WA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±22 |
| WI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 30 | ±38 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±46 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |