Loading…
Once you got to where you dropped off your ballot, how long did you have to wait before you could deposit your ballot and leave?
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Wait time to drop off mail ballot · Asked in 1 wave, 2024 · 10,973 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Not at all | Less than 10 minutes | 10 - 30 minutes | 31 minutes – 1 hour | More than 1 hour | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 88% | 10% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 10973 | ±1 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | ±26 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 26 | ±32 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – |
Cooperative Election Study 2024 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Election Study 2024 | 2024-10-01 to 2024-12-09 | web | 60,000 | 10,973 |
| – |
| 10 |
| ±53 |
| AZ | 84% | 12% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 634 | ±7 |
| CA | 88% | 10% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 1988 | ±3 |
| CO | 90% | 9% | 0% | 0% | – | 558 | ±6 |
| CT † | 90% | 10% | – | – | – | 43 | ±19 |
| DC † | 91% | 9% | – | – | – | 54 | ±15 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | ±39 |
| FL | 82% | 15% | 1% | 2% | – | 794 | ±6 |
| GA | 74% | 15% | 10% | 1% | 0% | 117 | ±13 |
| HI † | 85% | 12% | 4% | – | – | 84 | ±14 |
| IA † | 84% | 16% | – | – | – | 83 | ±18 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 51 | ±29 |
| IL | 92% | 8% | – | 0% | – | 408 | ±8 |
| IN † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 64 | ±22 |
| KS † | 92% | 8% | – | – | 1% | 58 | ±21 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 57 | ±27 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 38 | ±34 |
| MA | 94% | 5% | 1% | – | – | 278 | ±11 |
| MD | 94% | 5% | – | 1% | 1% | 244 | ±8 |
| ME † | 91% | 9% | – | – | – | 64 | ±14 |
| MI | 92% | 7% | 0% | – | – | 618 | ±6 |
| MN | 90% | 10% | 0% | – | – | 136 | ±11 |
| MO † | 83% | 11% | 5% | – | – | 40 | ±19 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | ±40 |
| MT | 84% | 12% | 4% | – | – | 100 | ±12 |
| NC † | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | 1% | 94 | ±17 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 19 | ±28 |
| NE † | 93% | 7% | – | 1% | – | 92 | ±17 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 23 | ±25 |
| NJ | 90% | 6% | 2% | 0% | 1% | 291 | ±8 |
| NM † | 84% | 11% | 6% | – | – | 40 | ±21 |
| NV † | 82% | 17% | 0% | – | – | 156 | ±15 |
| NY | 87% | 9% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 307 | ±8 |
| OH | 80% | 18% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 374 | ±9 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 51 | ±25 |
| OR | 92% | 7% | 1% | – | 0% | 599 | ±6 |
| PA | 87% | 12% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 593 | ±6 |
| RI † | 92% | 8% | – | – | – | 33 | ±21 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 36 | ±25 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 11 | ±32 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 26 | ±31 |
| TX | 65% | 14% | 17% | 3% | 1% | 167 | ±13 |
| UT | 90% | 9% | 1% | 1% | – | 263 | ±10 |
| VA | 89% | 10% | – | 2% | – | 164 | ±12 |
| VT † | 85% | 15% | – | – | – | 40 | ±17 |
| WA | 92% | 6% | 2% | – | 0% | 806 | ±5 |
| WI | 95% | 4% | 1% | – | 0% | 183 | ±12 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | ±49 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | ±34 |