Loading…
Which of the following offices have you run for? Select all that apply. [State legislature]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Ran for state legislature · Asked in 1 wave, 2022 · 1,937 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 10% | 90% | 1937 | ±3 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±48 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±24 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±37 |
| AZ † | 19% | 81% | 38 | ±19 | |
| CA | 7% | 93% | 154 | ±10 | |
Cooperative Election Study 2022 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Election Study 2022 | 2022-09-29 to 2022-12-15 | web | 60,000 | 1,937 |
| CO † |
| 9% |
| 91% |
| 26 |
| ±21 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 29 | ±25 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±45 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±64 |
| FL | 14% | 86% | 124 | ±11 |
| GA † | 8% | 92% | 48 | ±19 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±55 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±26 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±28 |
| IL | 4% | 96% | 95 | ±14 |
| IN † | 8% | 92% | 48 | ±16 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±24 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±26 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±62 |
| MA † | 6% | 94% | 48 | ±16 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±24 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±22 |
| MI | 5% | 95% | 76 | ±13 |
| MN † | 18% | 82% | 36 | ±18 |
| MO † | 16% | 84% | 49 | ±19 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±35 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±28 |
| NC † | 10% | 90% | 27 | ±21 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±46 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±35 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±22 |
| NJ † | 9% | 91% | 65 | ±16 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±36 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 21 | ±31 |
| NY | 14% | 86% | 132 | ±11 |
| OH | 8% | 92% | 78 | ±13 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±25 |
| OR † | 5% | 95% | 51 | ±18 |
| PA | 3% | 97% | 117 | ±11 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±57 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 19 | ±29 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±38 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±31 |
| TX | 8% | 92% | 133 | ±11 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±35 |
| VA † | 21% | 79% | 33 | ±21 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±36 |
| WA † | 9% | 91% | 61 | ±14 |
| WI † | 22% | 78% | 51 | ±16 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±36 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±38 |