Loading…
What was the problem? Check all that apply. [ID]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Voting problem: identification · Asked in 1 wave, 2022 · 1,170 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 23% | 77% | 1170 | ±4 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±69 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±35 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±57 |
| AZ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±30 |
| CA | 26% | 74% | 174 | ±11 | |
| CO † |
Cooperative Election Study 2022 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Election Study 2022 | 2022-09-29 to 2022-12-15 | web | 60,000 | 1,170 |
| 5% |
| 95% |
| 31 |
| ±20 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±31 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±56 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±62 |
| FL † | 36% | 64% | 52 | ±18 |
| GA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 34 | ±29 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±41 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±42 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±69 |
| IL † | 6% | 94% | 57 | ±15 |
| IN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±51 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±45 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±29 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±47 |
| MA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±35 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±25 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±42 |
| MI † | 9% | 91% | 48 | ±16 |
| MN † | 8% | 92% | 27 | ±21 |
| MO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±27 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±47 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±61 |
| NC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±33 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±70 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±60 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±39 |
| NJ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 28 | ±24 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±63 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±32 |
| NY † | 26% | 74% | 81 | ±14 |
| OH † | 18% | 82% | 49 | ±18 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±36 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±41 |
| PA † | 8% | 92% | 35 | ±20 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±47 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±28 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 21 | ±26 |
| TX † | 29% | 71% | 84 | ±20 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±80 |
| VA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±23 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±66 |
| WA † | 3% | 97% | 35 | ±18 |
| WI † | 21% | 79% | 37 | ±19 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±56 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |