Loading…
Which of the following offices have you run for? Select all that apply. [State legislature]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Has run for state legislature · Asked in 1 wave, 2020 · 1,807 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 12% | 88% | 1807 | ±3 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±45 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 19 | ±27 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±31 |
| AZ † | 5% | 95% | 40 | ±21 | |
| CA | 14% | 86% | 121 | ±11 | |
Cooperative Election Study 2020 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Election Study 2020 | 2020-09-29 to 2020-12-14 | web | 61,000 | 1,807 |
| CO † |
| Too few respondents |
| – |
| – |
| 25 |
| ±23 |
| CT † | 12% | 88% | 33 | ±19 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±73 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±40 |
| FL | 14% | 86% | 131 | ±13 |
| GA † | 20% | 80% | 35 | ±19 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±54 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±29 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±39 |
| IL | 7% | 93% | 82 | ±12 |
| IN † | 7% | 93% | 50 | ±17 |
| KS † | 11% | 89% | 26 | ±22 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±23 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±36 |
| MA † | 5% | 95% | 44 | ±16 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±22 |
| ME † | 28% | 72% | 28 | ±20 |
| MI | 10% | 90% | 75 | ±13 |
| MN † | 30% | 70% | 34 | ±18 |
| MO † | 6% | 94% | 46 | ±16 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±39 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±29 |
| NC † | 16% | 84% | 36 | ±18 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±42 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±34 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±25 |
| NJ † | 10% | 90% | 74 | ±20 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±30 |
| NV † | 20% | 80% | 30 | ±19 |
| NY † | 11% | 89% | 107 | ±15 |
| OH | 8% | 92% | 70 | ±14 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±30 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 35 | ±24 |
| PA | 3% | 97% | 102 | ±11 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±46 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±29 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±34 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±29 |
| TX | 9% | 91% | 130 | ±10 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±30 |
| VA † | 6% | 94% | 31 | ±19 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±34 |
| WA † | 8% | 92% | 51 | ±15 |
| WI † | 10% | 90% | 32 | ±19 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±36 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±40 |