Loading…
Which of the following offices have you run for? Select all that apply. [City Council]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Has run for office: city council · Asked in 1 wave, 2018 · 1,797 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 27% | 73% | 1797 | ±3 | |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±43 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±26 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±29 |
| AZ † | 26% | 74% | 40 | ±18 | |
| CA | 22% | 78% | 144 | ±12 | |
Cooperative Congressional Election Study 2018 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Congressional Election Study 2018 | 2018-09-27 to 2018-11-05 | web | 60,000 | 1,797 |
| CO † |
| 32% |
| 68% |
| 31 |
| ±20 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 28 | ±27 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±70 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±41 |
| FL | 33% | 67% | 114 | ±13 |
| GA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 35 | ±22 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 21 | ±23 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±47 |
| IL | 22% | 78% | 86 | ±13 |
| IN † | 16% | 84% | 44 | ±17 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±23 |
| KY † | 16% | 84% | 27 | ±21 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±44 |
| MA † | 26% | 74% | 48 | ±15 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±28 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±22 |
| MI † | 23% | 77% | 78 | ±15 |
| MN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±31 |
| MO † | 29% | 71% | 52 | ±19 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±41 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±29 |
| NC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 35 | ±23 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±32 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±35 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±24 |
| NJ † | 45% | 55% | 68 | ±17 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±42 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±24 |
| NY † | 31% | 69% | 85 | ±15 |
| OH † | 22% | 78% | 70 | ±15 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±42 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 33 | ±22 |
| PA | 19% | 81% | 115 | ±10 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±72 |
| SC † | 16% | 84% | 24 | ±22 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±49 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 30 | ±27 |
| TX † | 17% | 83% | 124 | ±17 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±23 |
| VA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±24 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±27 |
| WA † | 22% | 78% | 44 | ±16 |
| WI † | 42% | 58% | 45 | ±17 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±26 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±41 |