Loading…
What was the problem? Check all that apply. [Wrong place]
Asked of: Post-election wave respondents
Voting problem: went to the wrong polling place · Asked in 1 wave, 2018 · 942 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Post-election wave item: weight with extra.weight_post (commonpostweight). Wording from the year's CES guide.
| Group | Selected | Not selected | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 12% | 88% | 942 | ±5 | |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±27 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±46 |
| AZ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±24 |
| CA † | 12% | 88% | 110 | ±16 | |
| CO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±31 |
Cooperative Congressional Election Study 2018 · US adults 18+ (YouGov opt-in panels, sample-matched to an ACS frame and weighted). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Congressional Election Study 2018 | 2018-09-27 to 2018-11-05 | web | 60,000 | 942 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±40 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±73 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| FL † | 6% | 94% | 47 | ±17 |
| GA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 37 | ±27 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±57 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±37 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±49 |
| IL † | 9% | 91% | 42 | ±18 |
| IN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±30 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±28 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±49 |
| MA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±27 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±53 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±75 |
| MI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±26 |
| MN † | 11% | 89% | 27 | ±21 |
| MO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±27 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±49 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±43 |
| NC † | 15% | 85% | 42 | ±18 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±78 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±52 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±50 |
| NJ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 32 | ±29 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±51 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±36 |
| NY † | 22% | 78% | 54 | ±20 |
| OH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 39 | ±35 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±43 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±31 |
| PA † | 13% | 87% | 46 | ±16 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 1 | ±98 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±40 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±27 |
| TX † | 22% | 78% | 92 | ±17 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±37 |
| VA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±35 |
| WA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±31 |
| WI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 25 | ±24 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±53 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 2 | ±71 |