Loading…
Please state how you dealt with the infant formula shortage this year: (Select all that apply)
Asked of: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1
Watered down formula during shortage · Asked in 3 waves, 2022 · 1,652 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Periods loaded: week49, week50, week51. Select-all checkbox item. Code 1 = box checked; 0 = left unchecked by a respondent who checked another box in the same question (derived from Census's -99); -99 = saw the question and checked nothing (skipped). The question offers no 'none of these' box, so a respondent to whom no option applied looks like one who skipped it (-99 on every box); shares of 1 and 0 are among respondents who checked at least one box.
Shares of people who gave an answer. Each column is one wave, evenly spaced rather than to scale in time; hover for exact shares.
| Group | Not selected (box left unchecked; respondent checked another option) | Watering down formula or "making your own" formula | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents |
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 51 (2022-11-02 to 2022-11-14) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL9. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2022-11-02 to 2022-11-14 | web | 61,453 | 630 |
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 50 (2022-10-05 to 2022-10-17) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL9. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2022-10-05 to 2022-10-17 | web | 42,040 | 438 |
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 49 (2022-09-14 to 2022-09-26) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL9. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2022-09-14 to 2022-09-26 | web | 50,937 | 584 |
Shares of people who gave an answer. A group’s column is left blank in waves where its effective sample is under 50; hover for exact shares.
| 92% |
| 8% |
| 630 |
| ±7 |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±63 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±48 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±39 |
| AZ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±34 |
| CA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 40 | ±27 |
| CO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±45 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±45 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±47 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±74 |
| FL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±41 |
| GA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±34 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±53 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±29 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±42 |
| IL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±30 |
| IN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±30 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±46 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±36 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±43 |
| MA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 20 | ±31 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±30 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±43 |
| MI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±29 |
| MN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 13 | ±32 |
| MO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±29 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±29 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 5 | ±46 |
| NC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±63 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±50 |
| NE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±36 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 3 | ±59 |
| NJ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±37 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±47 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±40 |
| NY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±35 |
| OH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±39 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±35 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±36 |
| PA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±33 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±48 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±42 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±44 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±40 |
| TX † | Too few respondents | – | – | 36 | ±23 |
| UT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 28 | ±29 |
| VA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±25 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 7 | ±73 |
| WA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±28 |
| WI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±40 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±49 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±36 |
Household Pulse Survey, Week 51 (2022-11-02 to 2022-11-14) · US adults 18+ living in housing units (50 states and DC). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.