Loading…
Please state how you dealt with the infant formula shortage this year: (Select all that apply)
Asked of: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1
Formula shortage: other way of coping · Asked in 3 waves, 2022–2023 · 3,700 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
Periods loaded: week52, week53, week54. Select-all checkbox item. Code 1 = box checked; 0 = left unchecked by a respondent who checked another box in the same question (derived from Census's -99); -99 = saw the question and checked nothing (skipped). The question offers no 'none of these' box, so a respondent to whom no option applied looks like one who skipped it (-99 on every box); shares of 1 and 0 are among respondents who checked at least one box.
Shares of people who gave an answer. Each column is one wave, evenly spaced rather than to scale in time; hover for exact shares.
| Group | Not selected (box left unchecked; respondent checked another option) | Other, specify? | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 93% |
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 54 (2023-02-01 to 2023-02-13) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL12. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2023-02-01 to 2023-02-13 | web | 75,709 | 1,291 |
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 53 (2023-01-04 to 2023-01-16) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL12. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2023-01-04 to 2023-01-16 | web | 68,504 | 1,183 |
| Household Pulse Survey, Week 52 (2022-12-09 to 2022-12-19) Source variable FRMLA_DEAL12. Universe: FRMLA_YN = 1 and FRMLA_AFFCT = 1. Select-all item; code 0 derived from -99 (see question notes). | 2022-12-09 to 2022-12-19 | web | 70,685 | 1,226 |
Shares of people who gave an answer. A group’s column is left blank in waves where its effective sample is under 50; hover for exact shares.
| 7% |
| 1291 |
| ±5 |
| AK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±27 |
| AL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±22 |
| AR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±40 |
| AZ † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±23 |
| CA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 86 | ±22 |
| CO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 35 | ±22 |
| CT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±23 |
| DC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±30 |
| DE † | Too few respondents | – | – | 10 | ±40 |
| FL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 36 | ±23 |
| GA † | 91% | 9% | 42 | ±20 |
| HI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±50 |
| IA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±29 |
| ID † | Too few respondents | – | – | 23 | ±24 |
| IL † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±25 |
| IN † | 86% | 14% | 31 | ±21 |
| KS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±22 |
| KY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 14 | ±32 |
| LA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±29 |
| MA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 38 | ±23 |
| MD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 35 | ±24 |
| ME † | Too few respondents | – | – | 9 | ±46 |
| MI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 32 | ±26 |
| MN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±33 |
| MO † | Too few respondents | – | – | 27 | ±24 |
| MS † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±26 |
| MT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±28 |
| NC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 26 | ±26 |
| ND † | Too few respondents | – | – | 6 | ±42 |
| NE † | 97% | 3% | 29 | ±21 |
| NH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 17 | ±30 |
| NJ † | 91% | 9% | 33 | ±22 |
| NM † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±34 |
| NV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 15 | ±31 |
| NY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 18 | ±35 |
| OH † | Too few respondents | – | – | 24 | ±24 |
| OK † | Too few respondents | – | – | 29 | ±25 |
| OR † | Too few respondents | – | – | 28 | ±28 |
| PA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 29 | ±24 |
| RI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 4 | ±56 |
| SC † | Too few respondents | – | – | 12 | ±37 |
| SD † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±28 |
| TN † | Too few respondents | – | – | 30 | ±27 |
| TX † | 87% | 13% | 90 | ±19 |
| UT † | 90% | 10% | 54 | ±18 |
| VA † | Too few respondents | – | – | 28 | ±30 |
| VT † | Too few respondents | – | – | 11 | ±36 |
| WA † | 97% | 3% | 49 | ±21 |
| WI † | Too few respondents | – | – | 22 | ±26 |
| WV † | Too few respondents | – | – | 16 | ±30 |
| WY † | Too few respondents | – | – | 8 | ±41 |
Household Pulse Survey, Week 54 (2023-02-01 to 2023-02-13) · US adults 18+ living in housing units (50 states and DC). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.