← Back to story

Borough & districtFull briefing

Districts 2 and 26 tie at NYC's top — but one is screened-rich and one is zoned

The longer form of the briefing for this story: the original thesis, the supporting findings the data team flagged, and the reporting directions a journalist could follow. For the short version and the data analysis, see the main story page.

Thesis

Manhattan District 2 (Upper East/West, Murray Hill, Greenwich Village) and Queens District 26 (eastern Queens) tie at 78.2% on the elementary academic composite. But they get there by very different routes: D2 is dense with screened MS feeders and G&T programs, D26 is dominated by zoned neighborhood schools serving relatively-advantaged residents.

Supporting findings

  • Top ES composite (2024-25) by district:
  • D26 (Queens): 78.2%, avg proclivity 0.32
  • D2 (Manhattan): 78.2%, avg proclivity 0.30
  • D28 (Queens): 71.9%, avg proclivity 0.45
  • D25 (Queens): 71.4%, avg proclivity 0.45
  • D20 (Brooklyn): 70.9%, avg proclivity 0.56
  • D2 has 36 schools in the cut; D26 has 22 — D2 is bigger.
  • D2 has many screened middle schools (NEST+m, Salk, Quest) — selective sorting happens early.
  • D26 has very few screened seats — kids mostly attend their neighborhood school.
  • Both districts serve relatively-advantaged populations (proclivity ~0.3 — top 30% of NYC).
  • But D26 demonstrates: outcomes follow demographics, no screening required. So the D2 model isn't strictly necessary.
  • What can D2-like dense urban districts learn from D26's neighborhood-school model?

Reporting directions

  • Plot proficiency vs proclivity by district — is there a 'D26 effect' beyond demographics?
  • Interview Queens D26 superintendent on neighborhood-school philosophy.
  • Profile a D2 G&T school vs D26 zoned school serving demographically-similar populations.
  • What does D26 do about screening? Are MS still tracked even without official screen?

See the data analysis →