Loading…
Agreement with rarely counting on good things happening to the respondent; the 2004 version uses a 4-point scale and the 2016 version uses a 5-point scale with a neutral midpoint.
AI-matched An AI model grouped these questions and mapped their answers onto shared categories, and a second AI review checked and corrected the grouping and mapping. No person has checked it: compare the question wordings and the answer mapping below before reading the lines against each other.
Latest: 20% answered “Agree” in GSS: Rarely counting on good things happening, 2016.
Shares of everyone asked, including non-answers. Each point is one survey wave at the middle of its field period. Lines from different surveys are never spliced together.
| Line | Question | Match | How answers map |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSS: Rarely counting on good things happening | Rarely counting on good things happening (HAND CARD G1)
(Do you agree or disagree that . . .)
I rarely count on good things happening to me. Caveat: 5-point scale with neutral midpoint; code order is reversed relative to the 2004 item | equivalent | Strongly disagree → Disagree; Disagree → Disagree; Neutral → Neutral; Agree → Agree; Strongly agree → Agree |
| GSS: Rarely counts on good things happening | Rarely counts on good things happening Indicate your agreement with each of the following statements by selecting the number that comes closest to your answer:
H. I rarely count on good things happening to me. Caveat: 4-point scale with no neutral midpoint; strength of agreement collapsed | equivalent | Strongly agree → Agree; Agree → Agree; Disagree → Disagree; Strongly disagree → Disagree |