Loading…
Support for creating a national registry of police officers investigated for misconduct; the 2022 wording adds 'or disciplined for'.
AI-matched An AI model grouped these questions and mapped their answers onto shared categories, and a second AI review checked and corrected the grouping and mapping. No person has checked it: compare the question wordings and the answer mapping below before reading the lines against each other.
Latest: 80% answered “Support” in CES: National registry of police misconduct, 2022.
Shares of everyone asked, including non-answers. Each point is one survey wave at the middle of its field period. Lines from different surveys are never spliced together.
| Line | Question | Match | How answers map |
|---|---|---|---|
| CES: Create national registry of police misconduct | Create national registry of police misconduct Do you support or oppose each of the following proposals? [Create a national registry of police who have been investigated for or disciplined for misconduct.] Caveat: Reference wording (investigated for misconduct); wording truncated in the archive text. | identical | Support → Support; Oppose → Oppose |
| CES: National registry of police misconduct | National registry of police misconduct Do you support or oppose each of the following proposals? [Create a national registry of police who have been investigated for or disciplined for misconduct] Caveat: 2022 wording adds 'or disciplined for' misconduct, slightly broadening the registry. | equivalent | Support → Support; Oppose → Oppose |