Loading…
Support for creating a national registry of police officers investigated for misconduct; the 2022 wording adds 'or disciplined for'.
AI-matched An AI model grouped these questions and mapped their answers onto shared categories, and a second AI review checked and corrected the grouping and mapping. No person has checked it: compare the question wordings and the answer mapping below before reading the lines against each other.
Latest: 80% answered “Support” in CES: National registry of police misconduct, 2022.
Shares of people whose answer maps onto these categories (non-answers and answers outside the scale are left out), because surveys differ in whether they offer “don’t know.” Each point is one survey wave at the middle of its field period. Lines from different surveys are never spliced together.
| Line | Question | Match | How answers map |
|---|---|---|---|
| CES: Create national registry of police misconduct | Create national registry of police misconduct Do you support or oppose each of the following proposals? [Create a national registry of police who have been investigated for or disciplined for misconduct.] Caveat: Reference wording (investigated for misconduct); wording truncated in the archive text. | identical | Support → Support; Oppose → Oppose |
| CES: National registry of police misconduct | National registry of police misconduct Do you support or oppose each of the following proposals? [Create a national registry of police who have been investigated for or disciplined for misconduct] Caveat: 2022 wording adds 'or disciplined for' misconduct, slightly broadening the registry. | equivalent | Support → Support; Oppose → Oppose |