Currently under federal law, very high power, 50-caliber rifles that can penetrate armor from a mile away are available to people on the same basis as standard hunting rifles. Should such very high power rifles be 1) restricted Only to the police and military, or 2) available to civilians like standard hunting rifles as they are at present?
Restrict 50-caliber rifles to police and military · Asked in 1 wave, 2006 · 1,371 responses · weighted estimates computed from individual responses
| Group | Restricted to the police and military | Available to civilians like other hunting rifles | n | MoE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 86% | 14% | 1371 | ±3 | |
| Democrats | 91% | 9% | 425 | ±6 | |
| Independents (incl. leaners) | 86% | 14% | 526 | ±5 | |
| Republicans |
General Social Survey 2006 · US adults 18+ living in households (English, and Spanish since 2006). Shares of people who gave an answer. n is unweighted; ± is the 95% margin of error at 50% from the weighted effective sample. Groups with an effective sample under 50 are grayed; under 20, hidden.
| Poll | Field dates | Mode | Respondents | Responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Social Survey 2006 | 2006-03-07 to 2006-08-07 | face to face | 4,510 | 1,371 |
| 82% |
| 18% |
| 392 |
| ±6 |